RSS

What does $67K of web hosting get you.. If you're Newt, a major fail!

Mon, 6th February 2012, 17:19

A story in the Washington Post is reporting newly released campaign spending records that show Newt Gingrich’s campaign is now roughly only $600K in debt after earlier reporting deep debts and a long list of creditors. So one could ask, and rightfully so.. what does Newt's campaign have in common with a web hosting review site?

Interestingly enough, the campaign reportedly paid $67,000 to Gingrich Productions for web hosting and e-mail hosting. Gingrich Productions is led by Callista Gingrich.

Gingrich campaign adviser R.C. Hammond is quoted saying that Gingrich Productions was reimbursed for Web site and e-mail hosting and that no profit was made,” The records also show that $89,000 was paid to High Tech Win, the campaign’s Web site development firm. In an earlier report, it was stated that the Gingrich presidential campaign paid $8,400 to Gingrich Productions for the right to use the domain name, “newt.org”. It's unclear whether the $67K included the domain leasing.

Republicans are people also

In these tough economic times, individuals are weary of getting snafued by hidden fees and up charges. People would agree that 67K is some serious chump change for web hosting, HostJury almost has a civic duty to explore the numbers further. Its a number that begs to be explored!

A traceroute of the newt.org domain suggests that Gingrich Productions may be a reseller of SMARTech Corporation. Sourcewatch.org, the wikipedia style brainchild of The Center for Media and Democracy goes into great detail on the history of Smartech and the Republican establishment which includes hosting the convention in 04, as well as the Bush/Cheney websites.. all of which is outside the scope of this article. Suffice it to say a reseller account with “unlimited domains ” starts at $24.95 per month from HostGator.. There are also a number of reputable companies offering fully managed dedicated servers if you are particular about your neighbors! Sorry, HostJury doesn't track political affiliations :)

Trace the other frontrunner's to ensure an informed electorate.

Front runner Mitt Romney may be sitting on cloud nine but his website mittromney.com is being hosted on Amazon cloud hosting. The Ron Paul Revolution is powered by Tailor Made Servers out of Dallas.

While it may be unfair to measure website speeds without specifics like traffic metrics... we did using GTMetrix

-ronpaul.com gets two A
-mittromney.com got an A and a C
-Sorry Newt, but that $89K website on Republican servers is only getting a dismal D and a C. You may want to review your web host on Hostjury.com. See the comparison here

 

screenshot of comparision of GOP websites using GT Metrics

Google Summer of Code 2012 is on!

Sat, 4th February 2012, 19:41

This will be the 8th year for Google Summer of Code, an innovative program dedicated to introducing students from colleges and universities around the world to open source software development. The program offers student developers stipends to write code for various open source projects with the help of mentoring organizations from all around the globe. Over the past seven years Google Summer of Code has had 6,000 students from over 90 countries complete the program. The goal is to help these students pursue academic challenges over the summer break while they create and release open source code for the benefit of all.

Spread the word to your friends! If you know of a university student that would be interested in working on open source projects this summer, or if you know of an organization that might want to mentor students to work on their open source projects, please direct them to our Google Summer of Code 2012 website where they can find our timeline along with the FAQs. And stay tuned for more details coming soon!

Canadian Host Webserve loses CIRA Certified Registrar Status.

Fri, 3rd February 2012, 11:42

Dot CA domain holders that have registered a domain name or transfered one to Canadian web hosting company Webserve have been informed they will need to find a new registrar. In a press release, the Canadian Internet Registration Authority (CIRA) states:

This is to advise that Webserve Communications Inc. is no longer a CIRA Certified Registrar.

In order for Webserve Communications Inc. .CA Registrants to maintain their .CA domain name(s), Registrants will be responsible for transferring their domain name registration(s) to a new CIRA Certified Registrar of their choice.  All affected Registrants have been informed by CIRA of this development.

WebServe response:

By now you should have received an email from CIRA stating that you need to change your .ca domain name registrar company from WebServe to another company which is the normal procedure and expected, Since WebServe partnership with CIRA has been ended, however WebServe still will be able to register, renew or manage your domain name through our other partner channels.

To improve our domain name registration, transfer, renewal and managment system WebServe domain services will be moved to our new system which requires you to transfer your domain name, what this essentially means to you as the domain owner is basically nothing! You are only changing the name of your registrar, you will not notice any change in your website or domain name ownership or contact information, except the name of your registrar. Furthermore during the domain transfer your domain name will be renewed for one full year, that means your domain expiry date will be extended by one year regardless of what your domain expiry date is. So even if your domain name is not expiring and you have years left till expiry date still you will receive one year added to your current expiry date.

HostJury: Who are these other partners?

Victor: ENOM

HostJury: Why did Webserve lose its status?

Victor: I do not have this information

Victor: To encourage our valued clients complete the domain transfer/renewal process and as a thank you for supporting WebServe we will be offering 20% discount on all domain transfer/renewal fees. Please provide coupon code: TRNSCA over the phone or in the email to take advantage of this offer. end

Under the CIRA rules The Registrar’s failure to be re-certified each year by CIRA prior to the anniversary of its Certification Date will result in the automatic, immediate termination of this Agreement as of the anniversary of the Certification Date and the cancellation of the Registrar’s certification. HostJury will try to learn more about why WebServe lost their status and update this post.

$0.01 first month hosting coupon from HostGator

Thu, 2nd February 2012, 17:58

HostJury is compiling discount web hosting coupons and special offerings by various hosts. As always we recommend that while price may be a consideration when choosing a web host for your "baby", it should only be one of the many factors considered in your research. Page load speeds, additional features, good communication, and a fast knowledgeable support team will always top saving a few cents per day.

“Saving is a very fine thing.  Especially if your parents have done it for you."... that said, for most of us that just isn't the case so HostJury encourages you to take advantage of  discounts if available.  You will find coupons on the respective host review pages!

Hostgator one cent Sale/Discount coupon

Click here to get a $.001 hosting coupon for the first month from HostGator

Coupon for InMotion Hosting

Wed, 1st February 2012, 22:38

HostJury is compiling discount web hosting coupons and special offerings by various hosts. As always we recommend that while price may be a consideration when choosing a web host for your "baby", it should only be one of the many factors considered in your research. Page load speeds, additional features, good communication, and a fast knowledgeable support team will always top saving a few cents per day.

"By sowing frugality we reap liberty, a golden harvest."... which is why HostJury encourages you to take advantage of  discounts if available.  You will find coupons on the respective host review pages!

InMotion Hosting, Inc - Your Complete Hosting Solution coupon

Click here to get a $5.95 per month coupon from InMotion Hosting

Ontario Gov passes Accessibility Standards Law then fails to follow it

Wed, 1st February 2012, 16:06

On January 1, 2012, the Canadian Provincial government of Ontario's Integrated Accessibility Standards regulation under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005, became law. Described as making a number of very important and far-reaching changes, the Regulation represents a significant shift in human rights and accessibility law affecting nearly all organizations in Ontario with respect to their human resources practices and in the way they do business including web based business and communications.

Section 14 of the law mandates that Ontario government organizations and businesses will make their Internet and intranet websites and web content conform with the World Wide Web Consortium Web Content Accessibility Guidelines in accordance with a time line set out in the legislation.

The Government of Ontario is required  by January 1, 2012 to have all new websites and web content conform to the standards. By January 1, 2016, all government websites and web content must conform with the WCAG 2.0 Level AA.

Designated public sector organizations and large business organizations are allotted slightly more time, and are required to meet the requirements by January 1, 2014 for all new websites and web content.  All website content is required to conform by January 1, 2021, which would include archives and redundant content. These new rules not only apply to public facing web content, but also includes “ internal website used to privately and securely to share any part of the organization’s information or operational systems within the organization”

Wielding the big stick

The Regulation would enable a government official – a "director" – to assess an administrative penalty based on a consideration of the severity of the impact of the contravention (e.g. administrative oversight vs. health and safety risk), the contravention history of the person or organization in question, and the nature of the organization (corporation, unincorporated association or individual).

As example, penalties for individuals and unincorporated associations would generally range from $200 (for a contravention of minor impact and a minor contravention history) to $2,000 (for a contravention of major impact and a major contravention history).

The range for corporations would generally go from $500 to $15,000. However, in the case of contraventions of major impact coupled with a major contravention history, the administrative penalties can be assessed on a daily basis to a maximum of $100,000 for a corporation, and $50,000 for an individual or unincorporated association.

Of course the government has designated the License Appeal Tribunal as the tribunal responsible for hearing matters arising under the AODA!

After the Canadian Federal government got its knuckles rapped for what the Courts described as...

A systemic system wide problem of inaccessible Federal Government websites. The court also concluded the Federal Government too often does not even live up to its own inadequate website accessibility standard, and that the Federal Government’s 9-year-old accessibility standard for its websites “…has not been implemented, has not been enforced, and has not been made a priority by the deputy heads of the estimated 146 government departments and agencies who are responsible for implementing these standards.

You would think their Provincial counterparts would walk softly with that big stick!  Think again. Ontario Accessibility Fail...

The government is using social media and the web in an effort to raise awareness of the “very important and far-reaching changes”  that took affect on January 1, and has been promoting a informational page to achieve this goal. The new law requires all new web content published by the Ontario Provincial Government after January 2012, to be compliant with the INTEGRATED ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS.

So I ran a accessibility test on the information page... WAVE has detected no accessibility errors ...but you must still check your page to ensure it is actually accessible.

Alright... dig deeper. On the page it has a explore government section. In no particular order I run tests on pages. Between six and eleven errors depending on the page and which assessment tool I use! But this is not new content and wouldn't be in contravention of the act with the big stick...yet.  Back to the new Government Accessibility pages...  the screen-shot says it all...

Ontario Government Accesability page errors at 2012-02-01

The government's response at being called a hypocrite... thanks for the heads up. We've informed the web-master! While it is generally agreed that inclusiveness of all individuals in society is an ideal that everyone should strive to emmulate, attaining these goals may not be best accomplished by creating artificial time lines while wielding a threat of a big stick. The competitive global nature of the Internet while creating endless possibilities for enhancing Accessibility is not without obstacles that can not be considered solely in the vacuum of one regional area.

And what would the Premier of Ontario Dalton McGuinty say...

Screenshot of Dalton McGuinty Page with ACCESSIBILITY errors

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UK Institute of Blind Sues Airline.. is your site ready?

Tue, 31st January 2012, 17:07

In the UK, the Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB) is reported suing BMI Airlines after the airline failed to make changes for its website to be more accessible to blind and partially sighted people. The RNIB was apparently first alerted to a problem back in 2010 when one of its members complained that they could not use the site to make bookings.

Apparently RNIB gave the airline specific expert guidance and even provided a full audit report to help it in its compliance efforts. A message on bmibaby.com claims the airline is currently working with the RNIB to sort out its web woes:

Unfortunately our website is not fully accessible by people with sight problems, hearing, mobility and cognitive impairments. We are fully aware of this issue and are working alongside the RNIB to ensure our website is brought up to standard.

We have received the RNIB recommendations and we are working to rectify the proposals. Whilst we are going through this process users can call 08451238951 (A local rate number) to access our fares at the original web price. We will aim to update this page on a regular basis to keep users informed of our progress and are working to rectify the issues as soon as possible.

Website accessibility in the United Kingdom is specifically governed by the Equality Act 2010, which swallowed the old Disability and Discrimination Act 1995. However, the law is far from prescriptive, stating that web owners need only take “reasonable steps” to make their sites accessible.

A Global Issue

In November 2010, a Federal Court of Canada rendered a landmark ruling on accessibility of websites for persons with disabilities. With very detailed and persuasive reasons, the Federal Court of Canada agreed that there is a systemic problem of inaccessible Federal Government websites. This was found to be so despite Federal Government claims that it had been working for years on making those sites accessible.

The Court concluded that this was a system wide problem. It found that accessibility standards that the Federal Government uses for website accessibility were too weak and inadequate. It also found that the Federal Government too often did not even live up to its own inadequate website accessibility standard.

The Court ruled that the Federal Government’s 9-year-old accessibility standard for its websites “…has not been implemented, has not been enforced, and has not been made a priority by the deputy heads of the estimated 146 government departments and agencies who are responsible for implementing these standards.”  

Is your site up to par?

While making your website inclusive and accessible for all your visitors should be a given, there are practical reasons why it should be a priority. Search engines are effectively screen readers, and evaluate your site in much the same way as a screen reader used by a human. 

There is a number of free web accessibility evaluation tools available including one  provided by WebAIM. The site states that it is used to aid humans in the web accessibility evaluation process. Rather than providing a complex technical report, WAVE shows the original web page with embedded icons and indicators that reveal the accessibility of that page.

HostJury.com.. WAVE has detected no accessibility errors ...but you must still check your page to ensure it is actually accessible.

Do your part and get evaluated!

Network Solutions coupon. 25% off New Orders $75 or more

Mon, 30th January 2012, 19:18

HostJury is compiling discount web hosting coupons and special offerings by various hosts. As always we recommend that while price may be a consideration when choosing a web host for your "baby", it should only be one of the many factors considered in your research. Page load speeds, additional features, good communication, and a fast knowledgeable support team will always top saving a few cents per day.

"The best way to save money is not to lose it.". that said, HostJury encourages you to take advantage of  discounts if available.  You will find coupons on the respective host review pages!

25% off New Orders of $75 or more at Network Solutions

 

 

 

 

Click here to get 25% off New Orders of $75 or more at Network Solutions

HostPapa coupon for $3.95 per Month

Mon, 30th January 2012, 18:01

HostJury is compiling discount web hosting coupons and special offerings by various hosts. As always we recommend that while price may be a consideration when choosing a web host for your "baby", it should only be one of the many factors considered in your research. Page load speeds, additional features, good communication, and a fast knowledgeable support team will always top saving a few cents per day.

"In the old days a man who saved money was a miser; nowadays he's a wonder.". so HostJury encourages you to take advantage of  discounts if available.  You will find coupons on the respective host review pages!

HostPapa Green Energy Web Hosting coupon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click here get HostPapa Green Energy Web Hosting for $3.95 per Month

Incredible MidPhase coupon deals

Fri, 27th January 2012, 18:19

HostJury is compiling discount web hosting coupons and special offerings by various hosts. As always we recommend that while price may be a consideration when choosing a web host for your "baby", it should only be one of the many factors considered in your research. Page load speeds, additional features, good communication, and a fast knowledgeable support team will always top saving a few cents per day.

"Frugality without creativity is deprivation.".. so HostJury encourages you to take advantage of  discounts if available.  You will find coupons on the respective host review pages!

Unlimited Web Hosting Only $6.95 per Month!

 

 

 

- Click here to use coupon and get Unlimited Web Hosting Only $6.95 per Month from MidPhase

- Click here for Midphase Shared Windows Hosting coupon

- Click here to get an Incredible deal for 6 months free hosting Midphase coupon

25% Off Premium Web Hosting with WestHost Coupon

Fri, 27th January 2012, 17:27

HostJury is compiling discount web hosting coupons and special offerings by various hosts. As always we recommend that while price may be a consideration when choosing a web host for your "baby", it should only be one of the many factors considered in your research. Page load speeds, additional features, good communication, and a fast knowledgeable support team will always top saving a few cents per day.

"Being frugal does not mean being cheap! It means being economical and avoiding waste.. so HostJury encourages you to take advantage of discounts if available.  You will find coupons on the respective host review pages!

Get 25% Off Premium Web Hosting with WestHost.

 

 

Click here to use coupon and get 25% Off Premium Web Hosting with WestHost

Get 3 months free web hosting & 25% off with AN Hosting

Fri, 27th January 2012, 17:37

HostJury is compiling discount web hosting coupons and special offerings by various hosts. As always we recommend that while price may be a consideration when choosing a web host for your "baby", it should only be one of the many factors considered in your research. Page load speeds, additional features, good communication, and a fast knowledgeable support team will always top saving a few cents per day.

"Being frugal does not mean being cheap! It means being economical and avoiding waste.. so HostJury encourages you to take advantage of  discounts if available.  You will find coupons on the respective host review pages!

3 months free web hosting & 25% off with AN Hosting

 

 

 

Click here to use coupon and get 3 months free web hosting & 25% off with AN Hosting

IRS 1099-K cast a dubious net

Fri, 27th January 2012, 14:40

In these tough and evolving economic times, the number of people making money online continues to increase, and with governments innate ability to be a killjoy, the 1099-K has now been introduced . For the most part, the 1099-K was meant to ensure that income made from power sellers on sites like eBay is properly reported. The 1099-K is issued by third party payment processors, including banks and non-bank services like PayPal.

If you work online and your transactions are processed through PayPal, this will be reflected on the 1099-K issued by PayPal. If you sell through Amazon, and Amazon processes the transactions, you will be issued a 1099-K from Amazon.

Banks that also process transactions through a merchant account or some other way will also issue you a 1099-K, stating your income from such transactions. In order to be issued a 1099-K though, you will have to have participated in at least 200 transactions amounting to at least $20,000 over the course of the year.

The IRS saw some under-reporting regarding certain transactions where a 1099-MISC might not be issued because the situation may not have been considered a contract situation.

Issues with 1099-K Reporting

While changing, many individuals receive their payments via PayPal, (or some similar method). So people can fully expect to receive a 1099-K from PayPal, the bank, and of course many clients will also issue a 1099-MISC. The problem with this is that a lot of income is going to be double reported to the IRS, making it look like you are a Steve Jobs reincarnate!

As the IRS gets a copy of all these duplicated 1099's, you will need to protect yourself in the event of an audit by cross-referencing and providing the details to your accountant. Did I mention that this will provide a steady revenue stream for accountants and bookkeepers? Consolation is that these expenses can be deducted against your income. (Audits have increased dramatically under the Obama administration)

Even if you don't receive a 1099-K, you'll still have to report your income! Maybe the IRS never got the memo that it was Warren Buffet and Bill Gates demanding that the wealthy pay more taxes on their income!

Save 50% off monthly business hosting by Aplus.net

Fri, 27th January 2012, 00:11

HostJury is compiling discount web hosting coupons and special offerings by various hosts. As always we recommend that while price may be a consideration when choosing a web host for your "baby", it should only be one of the many factors considered in your research. Page load speeds, additional features, good communication, and a fast knowledgeable support team will always top saving a few cents per day.

"Being frugal does not mean being cheap! It means being economical and avoiding waste.. so HostJury encourages you to take advantage of  discounts if available.  You will find coupons on the respective host review pages!

aplus discount coupon for 50% off business hosting

 

 

 

Click here to use coupon and save 50% on monthly business hosting by Aplus.net!

Search algorithm takes punitive actions against ads

Tue, 24th January 2012, 22:59

Earlier today I passed by a site that was offering a “start a blog competition”, where the first person to reach the $3000 income goal would win a fifty dollar gift card. There was no runner up prizes as the promoters felt achieving the $3K threshold was a pretty good consolation prize in off itself.

While the lure of easy money in tough economic times may be appealing, new bloggers and website owners in general, may want to consider Google new search algorithm formula is taking punitive actions against websites that flood the top of their web pages with adverts.

According to Google, sites layouts where the visitors have to scroll down to finally view the relevant contents on the page annoys the users. Google will be penalizing those websites through search results and pagerank.

Google does state that if you decide to update your page layout, the page layout algorithm will automatically reflect the changes as the site is re-crawled by the search engine bots. How long that takes will depend on several factors, including the number of pages on your site and how efficiently Googlebot can crawl the content. On a typical website, it can take several weeks to crawl and process enough pages to reflect layout changes on the site.

The best advice for publishers is to continues to be to focus on delivering the best possible user experience which starts with a good web hosting company and a fast loading website. This change is just one of the over 500 "improvements" Google expect to roll out to their search algorithm this year.

As is often the case in these type scenarios, the real winner of the “start a blog competition” would be the increased traffic to the site offering the prize!

DreamHost suffers a breach... yawn

Mon, 23rd January 2012, 18:00

Web hosting service provider and domain name registrar DreamHost suffered a database breach on Friday and reset all 300,000 customers' FTP and shell access passwords. DreamHost sent an email stating, "Our security systems detected the potential breach this morning and we immediately took the defensive precaution of expiring and resetting all FTP/shell access passwords for all DreamHost customers and their users." All customers are advised to change their FTP/shell access passwords immediately, and although "web panel passwords, email passwords and billing information for DreamHost customers were not affected or accessed," the company "strongly" recommended changing your email password as a "precaution."

DreamHost detected the "potential" intrusion, blocked the acess, then notified their clients.  

According to the DreamHost blog, "One of DreamHost's database servers was illegally accessed using an exploit that was not previously known or prevented by our layered security systems in place. Our intrusion detection systems alerted our Security team to the potential hack, and we rapidly identified the means of illegal access and blocked it."

Neither DreamHost or their clients suffered any harm to their data or reputation. Certain other tech companies could learn a thing or two from this non story! 

 

 

 

 

Need SOPA to combat online piracy. Just ask Megaupload

Thu, 19th January 2012, 23:15

The Press Release

 
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT CHARGES LEADERS OF MEGAUPLOAD
WITH WIDESPREAD ONLINE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT

 

Seven individuals and two corporations have been charged in the United States with running an international organized criminal enterprise allegedly responsible for massive worldwide online piracy of numerous types of copyrighted works, through Megaupload.com and other related sites, generating more than $175 million in criminal proceeds and causing more than half a billion dollars in harm to copyright owners, the U.S. Justice Department and FBI announced today.

 
This action is among the largest criminal copyright cases ever brought by the United States and directly targets the misuse of a public content storage and distribution site to commit and facilitate intellectual property crime.
           
The individuals and two corporations – Megaupload Limited and Vestor Limited – were indicted by a grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia on Jan. 5, 2012, and charged with engaging in a racketeering conspiracy, conspiring to commit copyright infringement, conspiring to commit money laundering and two substantive counts of criminal copyright infringement. The individuals each face a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison on the charge of conspiracy to commit racketeering, five years in prison on the charge of conspiracy to commit copyright infringement, 20 years in prison on the charge of conspiracy to commit money laundering and five years in prison on each of the substantive charges of criminal copyright infringement.
 
The indictment alleges that the criminal enterprise is led by Kim Dotcom, aka Kim Schmitz and Kim Tim Jim Vestor, 37, a resident of both Hong Kong and New Zealand. Dotcom founded Megaupload Limited and is the director and sole shareholder of Vestor Limited, which has been used to hold his ownership interests in the Mega-affiliated sites.
           
In addition, the following alleged members of the Mega conspiracy were charged in the indictment:
  • Finn Batato, 38, a citizen and resident of Germany, who is the chief marketing officer;
  • Julius Bencko, 35, a citizen and resident of Slovakia, who is the graphic designer;
  • Sven Echternach, 39, a citizen and resident of Germany, who is the head of business development;
  • Mathias Ortmann, 40, a citizen of Germany and resident of both Germany and Hong Kong, who is the chief technical officer, co-founder and director;
  • Andrus Nomm, 32, a citizen of Estonia and resident of both Turkey and Estonia, who is a software programmer and head of the development software division;
  • Bram van der Kolk, aka Bramos, 29, a Dutch citizen and resident of both the Netherlands and New Zealand, who oversees programming and the underlying network structure for the Mega conspiracy websites.
Dotcom, Batato, Ortmann and van der Kolk were arrested today in Auckland, New Zealand, by New Zealand authorities, who executed provisional arrest warrants requested by the United States. Bencko, Echternach and Nomm remain at large. Today, law enforcement also executed more than 20 search warrants in the United States and eight countries, seized approximately $50 million in assets and targeted sites where Megaupload has servers in Ashburn, Va., Washington, D.C., the Netherlands and Canada. In addition, the U.S. District Court in Alexandria, Va., ordered the seizure of 18 domain names associated with the alleged Mega conspiracy.
           
According to the indictment, for more than five years the conspiracy has operated websites that unlawfully reproduce and distribute infringing copies of copyrighted works, including movies – often before their theatrical release – music, television programs, electronic books, and business and entertainment software on a massive scale. The conspirators’ content hosting site, Megaupload.com, is advertised as having more than one billion visits to the site, more than 150 million registered users, 50 million daily visitors and accounting for four percent of the total traffic on the Internet. The estimated harm caused by the conspiracy’s criminal conduct to copyright holders is well in excess of $500 million. The conspirators allegedly earned more than $175 million in illegal profits through advertising revenue and selling premium memberships.
           
The indictment states that the conspirators conducted their illegal operation using a business model expressly designed to promote uploading of the most popular copyrighted works for many millions of users to download. The indictment alleges that the site was structured to discourage the vast majority of its users from using Megaupload for long-term or personal storage by automatically deleting content that was not regularly downloaded. The conspirators further allegedly offered a rewards program that would provide users with financial incentives to upload popular content and drive web traffic to the site, often through user-generated websites known as linking sites. The conspirators allegedly paid users whom they specifically knew uploaded infringing content and publicized their links to users throughout the world.
           
In addition, by actively supporting the use of third-party linking sites to publicize infringing content, the conspirators did not need to publicize such content on the Megaupload site. Instead, the indictment alleges that the conspirators manipulated the perception of content available on their servers by not providing a public search function on the Megaupload site and by not including popular infringing content on the publicly available lists of top content downloaded by its users.
           
As alleged in the indictment, the conspirators failed to terminate accounts of users with known copyright infringement, selectively complied with their obligations to remove copyrighted materials from their servers and deliberately misrepresented to copyright holders that they had removed infringing content. For example, when notified by a rights holder that a file contained infringing content, the indictment alleges that the conspirators would disable only a single link to the file, deliberately and deceptively leaving the infringing content in place to make it seamlessly available to millions of users to access through any one of the many duplicate links available for that file.
 
The indictment charges the defendants with conspiring to launder money by paying users through the sites’ uploader reward program and paying companies to host the infringing content.
 
The case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia and the Computer Crime & Intellectual Property Section in the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. The Criminal Division’s Office of International Affairs, Organized Crime and Gang Section, and Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section also assisted with this case.
 
The investigation was initiated and led by the FBI at the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center (IPR Center), with assistance from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations. Substantial and critical assistance was provided by the New Zealand Police, the Organised and Financial Crime Agency of New Zealand (OFCANZ), the Crown Law Office of New Zealand and the Office of the Solicitor General for New Zealand; Hong Kong Customs and the Hong Kong Department of Justice; the Netherlands Police Agency and the Public Prosecutor’s Office for Serious Fraud and Environmental Crime in Rotterdam; London’s Metropolitan Police Service; Germany’s Bundeskriminalamt and the German Public Prosecutors; and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police – Greater Toronto Area (GTA) Federal Enforcement Section and the Integrated Technological Crime Unit and the Canadian Department of Justice’s International Assistance Group. Authorities in the United Kingdom, Australia and the Philippines also provided assistance.
 
This case is part of efforts being undertaken by the Department of Justice Task Force on Intellectual Property (IP Task Force) to stop the theft of intellectual property. Attorney General Eric Holder created the IP Task Force to combat the growing number of domestic and international intellectual property crimes, protect the health and safety of American consumers, and safeguard the nation’s economic security against those who seek to profit illegally from American creativity, innovation and hard work. The IP Task Force seeks to strengthen intellectual property rights protection through heightened criminal and civil enforcement, greater coordination among federal, state and local law enforcement partners, and increased focus on international enforcement efforts, including reinforcing relationships with key foreign partners and U.S. industry leaders. To learn more about the IP Task Force, go to www.justice.gov/dag/iptaskforce.


The Response 

 

Hacker activists of the Anonymous group are claiming responsibility for forcing offline several websites, including the U.S. Department of Justice, in retaliation for blocking popular file sharing hub Megaupload.com.

“Recording Industry Association of America - Department of Justice - Universal Music - all TT, all tango down,” the group said in its Twitter account.

“The Largest Attack Ever by Anonymous - 5,635 People Confirmed Using #LOIC [a denial-of-service attack application] to Bring Down Sites!” another message reads.

The attack came shortly after the Department of Justice press release. I am sure this has just begun!

 

 

Netcraft Reveals SSL Certificate Used in FasterPay Phishing Attack

Fri, 30th December 2011, 21:34

Netcraft's anti-phishing toolbar community identified a phishing attack against PayPal in December. FasterPay – which describes itself as the UK's only safe, all-in-one Internet Banking payment service – was apparently hacked, and a subdirectory on the company's own website at www.fasterpay.co.uk was used to host a PayPal phishing site.

The site sported the the Extended Validation SSL certificate used by the FasterPay website reducing the likelihood of arousing suspicion by visitors. While it may be a reminder that users may want to do more than merely look for the presence of an EV certificate when deciding whether or not it is safe to submit personal or financial data to a website, it is unclear what that would consist of.

As the SSL have the financial backing of the issuer, it will be interesting to see the fallout in the coming days.

GoDaddy... SOPA controversy just business as usual

Wed, 28th December 2011, 21:50

The adage “the only bad news is no news” maybe news to the new pension fund owners of GoDaddy  but historically controversy has often fueled the vehicle that has driven the most growth to the domain registrar and web hosting company. The crowd-sourced backlash against GoDaddy kicked off after the company appeared on an official list of companies supporting SOPA.

GoDaddy logo uses a gun with the barrel pointing backwards. Will the ploy backfire?


The idea of a domain registrar supporting DNS blocking legislation to serve the interests of overzealous copyright owners and media companies prompted Internet users to stage a widespread boycott, declaring December 29 "move your domain day." Then again, the idea of a domain registrar and web hosting company owner Bob Parsons standing next to an elephant he just shot may not be ideal for most businesses either but after the story went viral, Parsons registered the domain bobparsonskillselephants.com which still redirects to bobparsons.me!

Interestingly enough, GoDaddy initially dismissed the move as having little impact on their business, then later was said to be “scrambling” to let everyone know it no longer supports SOPA legislation. Fittingly, CEO for a week Warren Adelman, (took over from mentor Bob Parsons as GoDaddy CEO just over a week ago), has been making the rounds claiming that like the Grinch with a heart that grew:

“We were seeing and hearing customers and tech leaders — many of which are our customers — talking and writing about this so we did something that was easy to do: made changes to address their needs”

Many in the blogsphere claim that GoDaddy reps are cold calling “fleeing” domain holders with enticements to stay, while others have stated that there have been delays in transfer of domains. Verified GoDaddy employees have been defending or minimizing GoDaddy's involvement in SOPA on sites like Reddit.... Then there is Twitter. GoDaddy should be trending as it is being mentioned so often! One tweet says it all...

godaddy tweet for registrar of the year

The domain was Registered at GoDaddy.com

The Numbers DailyChanges.com

- Over 15,000 domain names were transferred from Godaddy.com on Thursday and over 21,000 were transferred away from Godaddy on Friday.
-  Note that on Thursday more domains were transferred into Godaddy.com (17,000) than left the registrar.
- On Friday Godaddy.com lost 21,054 domain through transfers out to other registrars, yet they received 20,034 transfers into Godaddy.com from other registrars.
- Last week prior to the call for the boycott on Thursday, Godaddy stats for transfers out:
Monday (8,800), Tuesday (13,000) and Wednesday (14,500).
- December 27th...
New Domains Registered: 18,401
Transferred in: 14,853
Transferred out: 8,862

It’s unlikely the Internet will ever be controversy-free. And would we really want it to be? Many Internet users enjoy (at least in part) the controversy that is so prevalent on the web. We all have a chance to be heard, whether it’s in matters of global importance, the latest celebrity gossip about Justin Bieber, or GoDaddy's next ploy!

SOPA

The proposed bill would allow the U.S. Department of Justice and copyright holders to block access to sites accused of infringing copyright, and stop payment processors and online advertising networks from doing business with them -- all without due process.

State of the Fed Web Report.. is anything not broke in America

Tue, 20th December 2011, 20:41

A new report details that the US federal government operates 11, 013 Web sites, own at least 1,489 .gov domains of which 804 of them are functional. Another 400 .gov domains redirect to other government Web sites, 265 don’t work and 20 are under development. Agencies report using a total of 150 different systems for creating and publishing web content and 250 Web hosting providers with an average of 10 web hosting providers per agency. (sketchy.. see below. 35% of domains are hosted externally )

The data, published in a report issued late last week by the General Services Administration and Office of Management and Budget, was compiled between August and October. The report cautions that the number of domains and websites fluctuates as agencies eliminate, consolidate or create them.

The report estimated that agencies operate about 11,013 Web sites, but notes that a definitive tally is difficult to obtain as many sites function as subdomains of a top level domain. Nasa.gov for example, contains the agency’s main site and numerous others for individual projects, missions and agency offices.

Regarding domain names, agencies reported that they plan to continue operating about 70 percent of the government’s .gov domains; 26 percent of the domains are expected to be eliminated in the coming months. while 4 percent will be redirected to other sites.

The number of domains owned by federal agencies varied from 160 at the Treasury Department to just two for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Five agencies own more than 100: Treasury, the departments of Health and Human Services and Commerce, the General Services Administration and the Interior Department. Of those, HHS, Interior and Commerce operate the most active domains, while Treasury owns 67 inactive domains, the report said.

And who visits federal Web sites most often? Well that would be federal employees. Among primary users of the 804 active domains, the report said 63 percent are federal workers, followed by researchers and the press.

KEY TAKEAWAY 

Content Management Systems (CMS)

- Almost all have a CMS, but use many different systems: All but one agency reported using a CMS; many different systems are used across the 24 major agencies. Agencies referred to 150 separate implementations of 42 different systems.

- Custom-built systems: Twelve agencies reported some sort of custom-built or in- house CMS.

- Exact number of CMS is unknown: Some agencies commented that the true number of CMS in use across the agency is unknown.

Web Hosting Providers

- Multiple web hosting providers in each agency: Most agencies reported using multiple hosting providers, with an average of 12 providers per agency.

- In-house hosting: Thirteen out of 24 major agencies (or 54%) reported that at least some websites are hosted internally.

- Growth anticipated due to cloud computing: Two of the major agencies (or 8%) expect additional growth in external web hosting providers due to the rise of cloud computing.

- Exact number of web hosting providers is unknown: Six out of 24 agencies (or 25%) stated that the true number of web hosting providers in use across the agency is unknown.

Another key takeaways on performance states:

Most agencies rated the performance of their websites as 'excellent' or 'good': On nearly every question related to key performance indicators, approximately 80% of websites were rated by agencies as excellent/good. The highest rated item was "meets Federal web requirements." For this item, 87% of websites were rated as excellent/good.

Second opinions

HostJury decided to get a second opinion. Figuring that if Nasa can put a man on the moon, how hard could it be to put a site on the web! It isn't rocket science.

Nasa.gov has a google pagerank of 9 and an alexa ranking in the mid 700 range. Historically there has not been a lot of competition for the keyword search terms.

Using GTmetrix, we evaluated the Nasa.gov website... the screenshot says it all:

Screen shot of GTmetrix anayalsis of nasa.gov

 

On the speed side though, just ping, an online tool that pings a domain from 50 locations worldwide returned some pretty good results for nasa.gov. Nasa obviously has less difficulty flying around the world!

GoDaddy discontinues ColdFusion Support annoying the "few"

Wed, 14th December 2011, 16:04

When some clients of GoDaddy relealized their sites were down, the emails from support were not exactly soothing... or what they wanted to hear. Alternative web hosts offering coldfusion support have been listed below.

Thank you for contacting Hosting Support. In regards to your hosting account for xyz.com:(redacted)

You account was suspended while we migrate your account off the discontinued Cold Fusion server. The suspension was necessary to protect your content. After the discontinuation of our Cold Fusion support, content of the .cfm files can be displayed on the internet as plain text which may reveal site usernames and passwords. We will promptly reinstate the hosting account once the migration is complete. Once access has been restore we highly recommend you remove all .cfm files to ensure your content remains secure.

You can find more information about the discontinuation of Cold Fusion support here:

community.godaddy.com/godaddy/go-daddy-to-discontinue-coldfusion-support/

Please contact us if you have any further issues.

The link directs clients to a page which states:

We emailed our customers on September 1, 2011 to let them know will discontinue ColdFusion support on November 29, 2011.
Please understand we decided to drop ColdFusion support only after seriously considering the impact on our customers. We recognize this change might disrupt some of your plans and could even put you in a situation where you have to find other solutions. To you and all our affected customers, we sincerely apologize. We hope the advanced notice gives you the time you need to make any necessary changes.
For those curious about our decision: It will let us make improvements in other areas. The truth is that only a small percentage of our customers use ColdFusion. We regret inconveniencing even a single customer but, in this case, we feel we can more efficiently and positively improve our customers' experiences by assigning our resources elsewhere.

GoDaddy does offer offer dedicated and virtual dedicated servers that support Cold Fusion but licensing is an expensive proposition.

Some ColdFusion clients of GoDaddy are expressing feelings of betrayal, suggesting not enough time was given to modify and code their websites for a transition to PHP databases, while others claim that they only became aware of the change when their sites went down.

Alternative Web hosts offering coldfusion

Add companies HostJury misses as a comment. HostJury makes no recommendation of the providers listed. We invite users of these services to review their experinces.

CFDynamics   1 gig diskspace and 20 gigs of transfer. $49.95 per month. ( couple  of smaller plans available but lame package constraints)

Hostek It appear they have a number of plans available. Some with limits, other with none (all hosting has limits!)

HostMYSite Appear to offer good package limits. Awaiting clarification on detail

Media3 is offering 3 months free.  1 gig and unmetered transfer (Unlimited... Okay, we've all heard that term before)

 

Basic truth-in-advertising principle... Fake News Works

Mon, 12th December 2011, 15:58

Another action in a string of “fake news” cases has the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charging a Web site operator with duping consumers with fictional articles.   As someone actively monitoring various news sources, the tagline grabbed my attention.  I have commented in the past that if I ever have a spare day I intend to further research web hosting companies that appear to generate an endless stream of news, press releases, and awards.

This particular press release concerned a Boris Mizhen out of Guilford, Conn., who allegedly operated a website hawking weight-loss supplement. Mizhen's affiliate marketers, would create fake news sites and then post articles that appeared to be objective reports. The FTC filed a complaint last month in federal district court in Connecticut alleging the scam.

In addition to duping people with fake news sites, Mizhen and his companies allegedly trick consumers by offering free trials to anyone willing to pay $5 mailing costs, instead then sending regular shipments at a cost of around $80 a month.

“Defendants made it very difficult for consumers to cancel these  "negative-option" continuity plans to avoid recurring charges or redeem promised money-back guarantees. Consumers apparently had great difficulty reaching a live person when they tried to cancel or request a refund,” the FTC says in its complaint.

Fake News

Fake news, as a tool of unscrupulous marketers dates back to classical times. It could invokes notions of traveling medicine shows, and 'doctors' peddling miracle snake oil cures! The use of a 'plant' in the audience, who was then pulled on stage to 'prove' that the mystery elixir cured all ailments, was common. In more modern times, late night infomercials used similar tactics to milk chronic suffers of insomnia with tales of fortune, gain, slim bodies and long life.

As the web began to siphon market share, a growing number of traditional “mainstream” media outlet resorted to slipping corporate-sponsored "video news releases" or VNRs — promotional segments designed to look like objective news reports — into their regular news programming. (This deception is illegal under FCC rules).

The wild west of the world wide web promised to be a Madison avenue's marketer wet dream, and the reality of the fantasy was not overstated. Mega millionaire were created everywhere! As the web evolved, the low entry bar and costs, created an unforeseen issue. The issue of being seen!

Within the traditional concepts of sales leads, direct marketing pitches, and promotional philosophy, new buzz words began to emerge as marketers reorientated themselves in the highly competitive, and crowded digital market place. Words like Behavioral or targeted marketing, Reputation Management, Online Visibility, Black and White Hat SEO, as well as keywords, and meta tags among others, became commonplace.

The issue of being seen!

The webhosting and tech industry faces many of the same obstacles faced by a billion other  web sites. Increasing and/or retaining market share requires a combination of online visibility, and reputation management. A reputable service and timely support also help, but as HJ reviews attest, some web hosts see these attributes as optional.

In a quest for SEO (search engine optimization is for another post … or two), some web hosts make almost daily announcements of additional new features, services, a website redesign, or going green!

Then there are the 'new appointment of so and so' with a job title that means little else. One is forced to wonder whether these hosting company are management top heavy, or the work environment is so toxic that they've installed revolving doors so the door doesn't hit them in the butt when they leave!

But is it Fake News

Some companies have won so many awards that they have more blingage than a hip hop rapper. Is it really meaningful to be one of the top 25 hosts in November from a site with a page rank of zero, that you can nominate your own company on?

Or a press release from a fake review site announcing the #1 Best Host for December:

The team at Redacted review site  has used the web hosting service of many of the companies they review; they take that experience and combine it with the reviews that others leave about the web hosting companies, and choose a Host of the Month.

There are a number of things to look for in the search for the best web hosting providers. When reading Redacted xyz company reviews some of the things the reviews talk about are the overall feature set, the uptime, and the customer service. Most of the best web hosting providers offer all the same basic web hosting features.

A webmaster that knows exactly what he/she will need for each site will want to verify that the host he/she chooses has the specific features that are needed; but for those that are new to web hosting, a plan like the one offered by Redacted xyz company will be more than adequate.

This same xyz company mentioned has uptime and support both rated at 8 out of a possible 100 score on HostJury.  Maybe HostJury just gets the disgruntled reviewers...

The FTC revised Guideline reflect three basic truth-in-advertising principles:
- Endorsements must be truthful and not misleading;
- If the advertiser doesn’t have proof that the endorser’s experience represents what consumers will achieve by using the product, the ad must clearly and conspicuously disclose the generally expected results in the depicted circumstances; and
- If there’s a connection between the endorser and the marketer of the product that would affect how people evaluate the endorsement, it should be disclosed.

The guidelines go onto state that there is no fine for not complying with an FTC guide, and that the FTC is not actively monitoring blogs, nor do they have any plans to do so.

Is Fake News Always Fake?

One media outlet reported on the rash of complaints against a website operation, and later was shocked  to find out its own news cast was being used to promote the very site it was investigating. When the reporter went to the website homepage, she found a link to a video montage of heavily edited news reports including a clip from their report. "Left out of the butchered version was information about the difficulty of winning a hot item."

And what about the Mizhen. Well his activities may have been curtailed but...

screen shot of leanspa homepage

The site is hosted at the Planet.
TraceRoute to 174.122.233.115 [leanspa.com]
73.e9.7aae.static.theplanet.com

SingleHop Zak Boca Emerging Entrepreneur.. He's leaving a mark in hosting!

Fri, 9th December 2011, 18:58

SingleHop Co-founder and CEO, Zak Boca has been chosen as an Emerging Entrepreneur by the Kentucky Entrepreneur Hall of Fame. The selection committee chose Boca based on the criteria of product and service innovation, overall contribution to the industry, as well as financial success and potential. Awesome, Inc., hopes to award Kentucky’s most successful entrepreneurs and encourage others to pursue similar ambitious endeavors.

Zak Boca, born and raised in Bowling Green, KY, moved to Chicago after attending Western Kentucky University to start MidPhase, a shared Web hosting company with SingleHop Co-founder, Dan Ushman.

“MidPhase was the second company I started, so I had some experience, but as every entrepreneur knows, each new business venture has a unique set of challenges.” Boca says.

Boca and Ushman sold midPhase in 2005, which at that point had grown to over 160,000 customers and $16 million in revenue.

After MidPhase was acquired by UK2, the two entrepreneurs started SingleHop, a dedicated and cloud Web hosting provider in October of 2006. In just five years SingleHop has become Chicago’s fastest-growing company, and the 2nd fastest-growing IT company in America with over 7,900% growth over the past three years. The company’s revenue for 2011 is an expected $24 million while its number of employees has increased by nearly 75%. “I’m extremely grateful for my success and thrilled to see the entrepreneurial spirit is alive and well in my home state of Kentucky,” said Boca.

Boca was among the following Emerging Entrepreneurs this year:

- Wayne Yeager, Webalytics

- Vidya Ravichandran, GlowTouch

- Heather Howell,

- Rooibee Red Tea

- Rob May, Backupify

 

About SingleHop, Inc.

HJ used Singlhop as one of the sample companies in our post about the BBB. They pull off an A if your interested, and have been BBB Accredited Business since 04/01/2008

SingleHop is a dedicated and cloud hosting provider that offers highly scalable, on-demand infrastructure services to both end-users and resellers primarily under monthly contracts. With clients in 114 countries, two Chicago-area data centers, and over 10,000 servers online, SingleHop delivers state-of-the-art hardware, server management customization and Infrastructure-as-a-Service. While combining security and convenience to provide solutions for a wide range of enterprises, SingleHop remains an industry leader in providing customers with automatic provisioning, remote management and accessibility using a variety of personal devices.

SingleHop was established in 2006 and makes its home in Chicago, IL. In 2011, the company was named #25 on the Inc. 500 list for the fastest-growing companies in America, a significant leap from #58 the previous year.


Dedicated Server Company declines $ to bring Zio Inc servers back on-line

Thu, 8th December 2011, 17:25

The Zio Inc story can teach numerous lessons on properly researching a prospective web host prior to committing yourself and your data. Questions regarding off site backups, financial stability, and the ability to easily generate and download a backup or copy of your data are as important as package limits, data transfer specs, and security measures that the web host utilizes.

On December 1st the owner of Zio Inc awoke to what he describes as a ridiculously long, almost 104 (editor's note... almost 104?), voice mails from clients informing him that the servers were off line. Zio's owner claims that the night before he had notified the dedicated server company he was leasing servers from, that a payment on services would be made by 6PM EST the next business day.

Apparently the company took the servers off line including those which Zio attests where current. Zio further states that the company required full payment for all the servers that were with them before the ones that I had been making timely payments on for THE LAST 2 YEARS could be reactivated.

It appears that the owner of Zio Inc made some inquiries on December 1 where it is alleged that statements including death threats were made to staff of the dedicated server company.

HostJury has chosen to refrain from identifying the dedicated server company hosting the servers as it appears their actions have been professional, and in keeping with industry protocol. It also appears this company allowed the servers to remain on-line for over 3 months. (past due dates on some invoices in August)

As always seems the case when a web host abruptly goes off line, a number of clients are finding themselves marooned with no website, data, or backups that can be restored on another web host. Web hosting companies can transfer data and websites from another host, but the server needs to be on-line to accomplish this.

HostJury approached the dedicated server company involved, inquiring whether it was possible to bring the servers on-line for 24 hours so that clients of Zio without backups, would have an opportunity to retrieve their data. HostJury offered to pay the cost associated with bringing the servers on-line for 24 hours.

Dedicated Server Company Response:

At this time no data will be released from any servers allocated to Zio Inc due to an ongoing legal investigation. If any clients of Zio Inc are frustrated with this decision, they can of course contact legal representation and direct that frustration via action against Zio Inc regarding their data.

We cannot and will not accept any payment for these services from anyone other then our direct client as per our privacy policies. Our direct client has been given numerous avenues for resolving his situation and is the only one who can resolve this situation affectively.

For clients of Zio Inc, it may be encouraging news that their data still exists, and likely will until at least the legal investigation is complete. Equally disheartening may be the knowledge that releasing that data may hinge on Zio Inc.

New guidelines on behavioral advertising tracking.. no cure for worst offender!

Wed, 7th December 2011, 15:26

The Privacy Commissioner of Canada Jennifer Stoddart.has launched new guidelines on online behavioral advertising which aim to set out restrictions on the tracking of children and tracking technologies that people can’t turn off.  Behavioral advertising involves tracking consumers’ online activities over time, in order to deliver advertisements that are targeted to their inferred interests.

“The use of online behavioral advertising has exploded and we’re concerned that Canadians’ privacy rights aren’t always being respected. Advertisers who use targeted online ads need to be upfront with Canadians about what they’re doing and must make it easy for people to say No to being tracked”, says Commissioner Stoddart.

The new guidance document says information about behavioral advertising should be clear, obvious and understandable.  Accepting participation in online behavioral advertising should not be considered a condition for people to use the Internet generally.  People must be able to easily opt out of this practice.

The guidelines, similar to those implemented in many western countries state including:

- If an individual can’t say no to the technology being used for tracking or targeting, then the industry shouldn’t use that technology for behavioral advertising purposes... that means no use of web bugs or web beacons, no super cookies, no pixel hacks, no device fingerprinting and no to any new covert tracking technique of which the user is unaware and has no reasonable way to decline.”

- that organizations should avoid knowingly tracking children and tracking on websites aimed at children. Children are not likely able to provide the meaningful consent required under our privacy law for the tracking of their online activities.

- advertisers should avoid collecting other sensitive information, such as individuals’ health information.

You need to turn off the tracking in your browser settings or preferences!

While the guidelines may be a necessary formality, Google, Microsoft and Mozilla have already responded to calls from the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and consumer watchdogs for a "do not track" option that allows Web surfers to protect their private information from being exploited by advertising networks. The major Web browser makers have decided it’s in their best interest to offer such options, even if it comes at the expense of some revenue generated by ads that use online behavior data to target consumers.

Bigger Threat... We need a plug-in for these guys!

Jennifer Stoddart, recently voiced her “deep concerns” about new surveillance powers proposed by the Canadian Government, and noted that it has so far failed to demonstrate why this is the best course of action. “Despite repeated calls, no systematic case has yet been made to justify the extent of the new investigative capabilities that would have been created by the bill,” she stated.

The changes eyed by the Government, spread out over three bills in the last Parliament, would also have given police greater power to obtain data gathered by Internet service providers. “These bills went far beyond simply maintaining investigative capacity or modernizing search powers,” says Ms. Stoddart.

“Rather, they added significant new capabilities for investigators to track, and search and seize digital information about individuals.”

One piece of legislation that will likely be revived, the Investigative Powers for the 21st Century Act, would have required Internet service providers to install surveillance technology on their networks.

It also would have forced mandatory disclosure of customer information on demand and without court oversight. This would obliged all ISPs to surrender customer details to the police including names, addresses, email address as well as the unique identifier number that every computer connection to the Internet is assigned.

“These bills went far beyond simply maintaining investigative capacity or modernizing search powers,” Ms. Stoddart said. “Rather, they added significant new capabilities for investigators to track, and search and seize digital information about individuals. “

Ms. Stoddart said Ottawa should consider alternatives to the changes they are planning.